![]() ![]() The Remington 783, on the other hand, is a new Remington design based upon new technologies. ![]() There’s also a thriving after market for the ‘700 that can make it shoot amazing well. ![]() And each one of them, costs alot of damn money. It’s refinementsover the decades have been… ahh “safe.” No individual changes have been revolutionary, but improvements have consistently made it better. It does so by being a spectacular design and by being manufactured with excellent craftsmanship. And with Remington, there are two contenders for me: There are obviously, plenty of choices out there, but well, I’m going for a Remington… Why?! History? The Name? I don’t know. The only question is, which one? I don’t have the energy to build another Mosin, and a new rifle will (can) cost less. So I think it’s time for another bolt-action. The small caliber, 50-yard ranges get kinda boring. :-(īut I kinda miss the process of manually cambering individual rounds, looking through the scope, engaging targets on the 200 and 300 meter ranges. And alas, a guy at the shooting range made me a financial offer I just could NOT refuse, and he now owns that rifle. That rifle could do things that no 70+ year old rifle should’ve been able to do. The only bolt-action amongst them, was a amazing Mosin Nagant. I’ve built and customized a few rifles now. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |